![]() |
|
March 2010 |
|
Tsar & Tsai Lex News is aimed at providing the readers and clients (1) important recent changes in the laws and regulations in Taiwan, (2) practical views and interpretations on the laws, (3) important legal news and case developments, and (4) information on recent activities of Tsar & Tsai Law Firm. If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact us (Tel: 886-2-2781-4111; e-mail: Law@TsarTsai.com.tw ).
Editors:
|
|
Recent Firm Activities |
|
|
Particulars on Employee Investment Accounts
Promulgated – On
13 January 2010, the Financial Supervisory
Commission (“FSC”) issued a regulation governing
the registration of employee investment accounts
by foreign issuers with shares listed on Taiwan
Stock Exchange (or OTC) and emerging stock
companies under the "Regulations Governing the
Offering and Issuance of Securities by Foreign
Securities Issuers". The important
regulation on employee investment accounts
include: (1) Registration of a collective
employee investment account with the Taiwan
Stock Exchange by an Offshore Foreign
Institutional Investor. (2) An investment
account shall comply with the following: (a) No
securities transaction is allowed except for
sale of shares obtained by foreign employees in
other countries exercising their stock option
rights and through assignment and distribution;
(b) Upon becoming shareholders, the employees
registered in the investment account shall
authorize and assign a domestic proxy to
exercise their voting power, and to exercise
such power pursuant to the Custodian Agreement;
(c) The agreement shall expressively provide the
rights and obligations of both parties; (d) If
no collective employee investment account is set
up as mentioned above, shares shall be disposed
of pursuant to the "Regulations Governing
Investment in Securities by Overseas Chinese and
Foreign Nationals" and each individual employee
shall register an investment account as an
offshore foreign person; and (e) Employees
referred to under the Regulation do not include
shareholders with more than 10% of shareholding
percentage. Furthermore, pursuant to the
"Regulations Governing Investment in Securities
and Futures in Taiwan by Chinese Investors",
emerging stock companies may not transfer shares
to Chinese employees. (Tsz-Jeng Lin) Lowering Of Withholding Tax Rate For Foreign Investors To 20% – According to the amended "Schedule of Withholding Rates for Various Incomes" by the Ministry of Finance (“MOF”), starting from 1 January 2010, withholding tax rate on net dividends and earnings received by individuals not residing in Taiwan, profit seeking enterprises headquartered outside of Taiwan, Chinese who do not reside in Taiwan for more than 183 days during the taxable year and legal entities, organizations or other institutions from China and the companies invested by them in any third country, whether or not the investment is approved, is reduced to 20%. (Eugenia Chuang)
Tax
Collection Act Amended in Favor of Tax Payers
– On 6 January
2010, the President promulgated the amendment to
the Tax Collection Act. The addition of Chapter
1-1 on “Protection of Taxpayer’s Rights” is to
expressively provide that confessions
inconsistent with the truth that are purposely
obtained by the tax authorities with
inappropriate measures may not serve as evidence
of taxation or punishment assessment. In
addition, profit-seeking enterprises who fail to
perform the obligation of obtaining, delivering
and keeping certificates may be punished with a
fine in the amount of 5% of the total amount of
the relevant certificates as verified and
determined, but such fine shall not exceeding
NT$ 1 million in total. (
Administrative Litigation Code Amended To
Facilitate Litigation By General Public
– On 13 January 2010, the
President promulgated the amendment to the
Administrative Litigation Code. The main
amendments are: (1) Actions resulted from
insurance relationship under public law are
governed by the administrative court where the
insured or the beneficiary resides, the insured
works, or the principal business location of the
insurance applicant to facilitate filing with an
administrative court near one's residence or
business operation. (2) The plaintiff may
deliver the filing documents by fax or
electronic mail to reduce expenses on personal
delivery or mailing process. (3) For
complicated actions whereby damage amount is
hard to determine, the court may determine the
amount in discretion with all conditions
considered if the parties have proved that
damages did occur yet failed to substantiate the
amount or have significant difficulty in proving
such amount. In addition, considering the
higher level of living standard in Taiwan, the
amount of claim that applies to summary
proceedings is increased from under NT$200,000
to under NT$400,000. Simple cases involve
smaller amount of claim may close within a
shorter period of time. (Maggie Lin) SITEs Permitted To Invest In Listed Securities In China – On 29 January 2010, the FSC promulgated the "Principles Governing SITEs Applying to the Competent Authorities in China as QDII to Invest in Listed Securities in China". Under the Principles, Taiwanese SITEs may apply to the competent authorities in China to become QDII, provided however, they shall file with the FSC for recordation within 5 business days of obtaining the QDII approval, changes in conditions of approval, withdrawal or revocation. The SITEs shall also file with the Securities Investment Trust and Consulting Association the position and amount (in RMB) of the listed securities invested by its investment trust fund and full-discretionary investment on a monthly basis. (Maggie Lin)
The FSC Promulgated The
Cap For Mainland Investors Investing In Taiwan
Securities –
On 15 January 2010, the FSC released an
administrative order stating that the QDII
approved by the Chinese government may invest in
securities and futures in Taiwan but the
invested amount may not exceed USD 500 million.
The custodian banks of QDII are required to
apply to the Taiwan Stock Exchange for quotas
prior to the remittance and the quota for each
QDII is caped at USD 80 million. The caps
on shareholdings for specific industries are as
follows: (1) Natural gas business and the MOEA
directly invested enterprises: any single
Chinese investor’s shareholding and the
aggregate shareholding by all Chinese investors
shall not exceed 10%. (2) Marine business: any
single Chinese investor’s shareholding and the
aggregate shareholding by all Chinese investors
shall not exceed 8%. (3) Financial services
industry: any single Chinese investor’s
shareholding shall not exceed 5% and the
aggregate shareholding by all Chinese investors
shall not exceed 10%. (4) Civil aviation, air
freight forwarders, securities and futures
trading/clearing business, security services,
real estate development business, construction
business and real estate brokerage business,
radio and television business, radio and
television programs provision business and
telecom services are prohibited from Chinese
investment. (
Change of
Final Users Of Imported Strategic Hi-Tech
Products Disapproved-On
13 January 2010, the President promulgated the
amendment to the Foreign Trade Act. To
synchronize with international regulations and
to solidify the enforcement of UN regulations on
chemical weapons, the amendment provides that,
without prior approval, the intended final users
of exported/imported strategic high-tech
products shall not be altered. A criminal
penalty and administrative sanction may be
imposed on violators. (
Restriction On The Facility Amount Relaxed For
M&A Transaction-
On 28 January 2010, the FSC promulgated the
“Particulars Regarding Authorization under
Article 33-3 of the Banking Act”. Article 3
of the Particulars provides that when a
company’s total facility amount provided by a
bank exceeds the cap set by Article 2 due to the
company’s merger, acquisition or spin-off, the
bank may, within five years from the date of the
merger, acquisition or spin-off, continue to
provide loans to the company based on the
original facility amount if the competent
authority of the industry or the Ministry of
Economics Affairs has issued an opinion
recognizing that the funding plan meets the need
of industry development and the bank has fully
assessed the credit risk of the loan. ( Amendments of the Civil Code on Rights In Rem – On 2 February 2010, the President promulgated the amendments of the Chapter of the Taiwan Civil Code on Rights In Rem which will become effective in 6 months. The major changes are: (1) increasing the value of space by permitting creation of superficies right above and under the ground; (2) creating new type of servitude such as a right of view or light to avoid blockage of views and lights; and (3) amend adverse possession rights to reinforce protection of real property rights by prohibiting adverse possession of registered real property. (Chia-Yu Chang)
Provision
on Death and Funeral Expense Benefits For Minors
Under Age 14 Removed
– On 3 February 2010, the
amended Article 107 of the Insurance Act
promulgated by the President on 1 February 2010
became effective. According to the
amendments, the original provision on death and
funeral benefits for insureds who are minors
under age of 14 is removed. Death benefit for
insureds below age 15 will not take effect until
the insured reaches the age of 15. For
insured who dies before 15, the insurer shall
repay the total premium paid plus interest
accrued to the policyholder. For insured
who is mentally impaired or of diminished mental
capacity, the funeral expense benefits remain
but is reduced from NTD2 million to an amount
equal to a half of the funeral expense allowed
under the Estate Act, i.e. NTD500,000, as the
cap to avoid moral hazard. (
Model
Policy Provisions of Traditional Life Insurance
Proposed –
According to the draft Model Policy Provisions
of Traditional Life Insurance proposed by the
Consumer Protection Commission, in addition to
the existing practice that applicants may cancel
policy within 10 days after receipt of the
policy documents, an additional 3 days will be
offered for the applicants to review policy
provisions before signing the application forms.
The FSC is considering the proposal and will
decide corresponding measures for formal
implementation. ( Amendments to Copyright Act and Copyright Intermediary Organization Act Promulgated - On 10 February 2010, the President promulgated the amendment to the Copy right Act and Copyright Intermediary Organization Act. The highlights of the amendments are as follows: (1) On amendment of Copyright Act, the provisions of criminal penalty do not apply in the following circumstances except for works subject to the management of copyright collective management organizations: (a) Exploitation of digitized karaoke machines or jukeboxes which contain licensed duplication(s) of music works for public performance; (b) Re-broadcasting works of an original broadcast; (c) Communicating the sounds or images of an original broadcast to the public with loudspeaker or other equipment; (d) Communicating the works to the public through public broadcasting or simultaneous public transmission of advertisement by a broadcaster, within which such works have been reproduced under authorization. (2) On amendment of Copyright Intermediary Organization Act, (a) The title of the Act has been changed from “Copyright Intermediary Organization Act” to “Copyright Collective Management Organization Act”; (b) The new system of “joint tariff” and “one-stop shop”: with respect to specified types of exploitation and relevant CMOs designated by the TIPO, multiple CMOs should set up a “joint tariff” and designate one CMO to collect royalty from users. The amendments will become effective two years after promulgation. (Sean Fan / Kevin Wei) |
Tsar & Tsai successfully assisted Powerchip Semiconductor Corp. (“PSC”) to reach an agreement with approximately 90% of holders of PSC’s overseas convertible bonds, which were due on February 2, 2010, to convert the bonds into part shares and part cash thus completing the debt restructuring plan in the amount of approximately US$130 million. Tsar & Tsai also assisted PSC to reach an agreement with the Gre Tai Securities Market to continue the trading of PSC shares despite that not all bond holders agreed to accept the debt restructuring plan. (Yvonne Liu / Jackie Lin) On 25
March 2010, Tsar & Tsai will hold a Forum on
Company Act in cooperation with the National
Chiao-tung University Institute of Technology
Law. On 3 to 4 March 2010, Ms. Eugenia Chuang participated in the Asia M&A Forum 2010 held by IFLR in Hong Kong. |
|
MOEA
De-registered Far East
Group’s Capital Increase Registration in Pacific
Lutong Co., Ltd. –
Tsar & Tsai successfully assisted Pacific
Construction Group in obtaining a winning
judgment against an employee of Far East Group
for forgery of shareholder meeting minutes and
board meeting minutes of Pacific Lutong Co.,
Ltd. Based on the judgment, the Ministry
of Economic Affairs on 3 February 2010 canceled
Pacific Lutong Co., Ltd.’s registration
of NT$4 billion capital increase injected by Far
East Group. ( Government May Refuse To Accept Substitute Supplier Which Merges Company on Purchasing Blacklist – According to the Regulation on Joint Bidding, if one of the joint suppliers of a government procurement contract is bankrupt or suffers from other hardship which caused such joint supplier not being able to perform the government procurement contract, other suppliers of the team may, after obtaining the procuring government entity’s approval, substitute a supplier for the performance of the government procurement contract. The procuring government entity shall not refuse the proposed substitute supplier without cause. On 25 December 2009, the Public Construction Commission of the Executive Yuan, however, issued an administrative interpretation stating that a government purchasing entity may refuse to accept the substitute supplier if such substitute supplier has previously merged another company that is on the black list for government procurement projects. (Tsz-Jeng Lin) |
|
|
COMMENTARY
-- Impact of
Recent Amendments Of The “Regulations Regarding
Tender Offers of Securities of Publicly Issued
Companies” On Management Buy Out (“MBO”)
By Matt Liu |
|
|
The Financial
Supervisory Commission (“FSC”) promulgated an
amendment to the “Regulation Regarding Tender
Offers of Securities of Publicly Issued
Companies” (“Regulation”) on The newly added Article 7-1 reiterates the requirement under Paragraph 1, Article 43-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act (“SEA”) that the purchaser shall conduct the tender offer based on the same conditions. Paragraph 2, Article 7-1 provides that the purchaser cannot enter into any agreement or contract with certain shareholders of the target company entitling such shareholders to have any additional right after tendering their shares which may result in deviation from the purchase conditions offered to all the shareholders of the target company. The legislative reason of Paragraph 2, Article 7-1 states that the purpose of this amendment is for the protection of the rights and interests of the shareholders who tender their shares during the tender offer process in an MBO transaction. The purchase conditions offered to all the shareholders of the target company will be different, if there is any agreement or contract which accords certain shareholders of the target company with any additional right after tendering their shares. It is stipulated in Paragraph 2 that the purchaser is prohibited from entering into any agreement or contract with certain shareholders of the target company to accord such shareholders any special right after tendering their shares in order to comply with the same purchase condition requirement (For example: If any shareholder of the target company may invest in the purchaser or its related party, such shareholder shall complete the contemplated investment before tendering their shares, or the source of their investment fund shall be different from the consideration of their tendered shares)” In the past practice, if the management (or major shareholders) of the target company intends to continue to control the target company after the completion of tender offer, they normally would reach a pre-agreement or pre-contract with the purchaser or its related party allowing them to invest in the purchaser or its holding company after tendering their shares in addition to the consideration of their tendered shares. Such right would enable the management of the target company to squeeze out the minority shareholders after completion of the tender offer, while continuing to control the target company by their own or together with others. However, the minority shareholders are not accorded with the same right. The FSC considers such arrangement constitute a discrimination against the minority shareholders and thus in violation of the same purchase condition requirement under Paragraph 1, Article 43-2 of the SEA. Therefore, the FSC added Paragraph 2, Article 7-1 in the Regulation to expressly prohibit such arrangement. The purchaser who violates such provision may be deemed by the FSC to violate Paragraph 1, Article 43-2 of the SEA and imposed of an administrative fine in the amount of NT$240,000 to NT$2, 400,000 according to Article 178 of the SEA. On the other hand, the minority shareholders may bring a civil lawsuit against the management of the target company for breach of their fiduciary duty and/or file a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust. According to the above-mentioned amendment, in the future, if the management team of a company would like to launch a MBO by way of tender offer, it is advisable for the management to enter into the above-mentioned investment agreement with the purchaser or its related party before commencement of the tender offer, use its own fund or borrow a loan to fund such investment, and disclose such investment agreement in the tender offer circular. Further, the management shall refrain from using the proceeds of their tendered shares to fund such investment so that the purchaser will not be deemed to violate Paragraph 2, Article 7 of the Regulation, Paragraph 1 and Article 43-2 of the SEA. Otherwise, the purchaser may run into the risk of possible FSC sanctions and the management team may be faced with potential civil lawsuit and/or criminal complaint brought by the minority shareholders. |
|
| The contents of Tsar & Tsai Lex News are not legal opinions and shall not be taken as legal advice on any particular issue or case. If the reader has any suggestions or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. |
|
8TH FL.,
TEL: 886-2-27814111 or 66386999 FAX: 886-2-27213834 or 27315581 www.TsarTsai.com.tw Law@TsarTsai.com.tw Copyright © Tsar & Tsai Law Firm, All rights reserved |
|
If you do
not wish to receive Tsar & Tsai
Lex News in the future, please click here |